🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the country. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the records is under way. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration represents how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.