🔗 Share this article Families' Anguish Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family. An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations. A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward. “At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.” Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated. Troubled by the Past A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard. “It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.” “I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.” A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved. “It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.” In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.” Seeking Answers and Certainty An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried. Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching. “It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.” A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.” He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.” “Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.” The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.